For investors, world war one was a bolt from the blue - a crisis almost wholly unanticipated by stock markets until the first week of July 1914. By contrast, world war two was long foreseen by the markets, priced in from as early as 1936.
World war three was different again. As the nuclear arsenals of the superpowers grew ever larger, it became harder to imagine a life worth living after Armageddon; shorting the planet was not really an option.
As it turned out, of course, the third world war was only the third world's war: a series of nasty proxy wars fought with conventional weapons in peripheral theatres from Angola to Guatemala to Vietnam. World war four was supposed to be the showdown between the west and radical Islam, forecast in 1993 by Samuel Huntington as the "clash of civilisations". Since the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001, investors have had to take this nightmare scenario seriously. And the worse things have gone in the Middle East since the invasion of Iraq, the more likely it has seemed the US might launch its next pre-emptive strike against neighbouring Iran.
Until last week, only a congenital optimist could rule out US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, the Iranian president, seemed almost to be asking for a confrontation, openly boasting about his country's uranium enrichment programme and warning the US "not to play with the lion's tail". His American counterpart declared last August: "Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust." Indeed, George W. Bush went even further in October, saying: "If you're interested in avoiding world war three, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing [the Iranians] from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."
The International Atomic Energy Agency reported an acceleration of Iran's uranium enrichment, escalating tension. Seven days ago, I would have put the probability of US military action at about 40 per cent. What did Mr Bush have to lose? Unable to seek a third term in office, he was said to be convinced that his successor would (perhaps literally) lack the cojones to confront Tehran. And the Israelis seemed to have shown the low political cost of air strikes with their hit on a suspected Syrian nuclear facility. It would not have been a world war, after all, though the impact on crude oil prices would surely have been substantial.
Then came the new National Intelligence Estimate, a very different kind of bolt from the blue. "We judge with high confidence," its authors declared, "that in fall 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme." Do those words mean "world war four" has been cancelled?
Do not speak too soon. A senior official close to the IAEA told The New York Times: "We don't buy the American analysis 100 per cent. We are not that generous with Iran." A close reading of the assessment suggested Mr Bush could still find reason to be suspicious. The report expresses only "moderate confidence" Iran did not restart its nuclear weapons programme this year. Its authors believe "with low confidence that Iran probably has imported at least some weapons-usable fissile material".
Nevertheless, it has now become much harder for Mr Bush to justify pre-emptive military action in the year he still has in office. It is, says the report, "very unlikely" Iran could produce enough highly-enriched uranium to make a nuclear weapon by late 2009. The more likely date is between 2010 and 2015.
One prominent commentator, the erstwhile hawk Robert Kagan, now argues this is an opportunity for Mr Bush to morph into a dove by adopting a new policy of diplomatic engagement with Iran. But it just is not in this president's nature to beat his sword into a ploughshare. In any case, it seems doubtful the Iranians would take such a volte-face seriously.
Where Mr Kagan has a point is that the time may well have arrived to rethink US policy towards Iran. Until 1979, relations between Washington and Tehran were a foundation of American strategy in the Middle East. Since the revolution that overthrew the Shah, there have barely been any relations at all.
Iran has been and remains an important major sponsor of organisations hostile to the US and its ally, Israel, among them terrorist groups. The US response has been sanctions and more sanctions. The result has been worse than a stalemate. On Mr Bush's watch, Iran's political position has got stronger. If the US quits Iraq prematurely, Persian hegemony in the Gulf could become a reality, even without nukes.
Mr Bush's successor needs a different approach, offering a grand bargain to Tehran: economic assistance and diplomatic rapprochement for a renunciation of nuclear weapons and terrorism. Sounds implausible? No more so than Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon's opening to Maoist China in 1972. But which of today's presidential candidates could pull it off? Surely not foreign policy novices like Barack Obama, Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee. Surely not the fire-breathing Rudy Giuliani, a paid-up believer in world war four. Surely not, Iran being what it is, a woman.
Step forward John McCain. For who could more credibly put the next world war on ice than a veteran of Vietnam, itself a subplot in the third world's war?
Niall Ferguson: America’s Global Retreat
1393169144
Mexico’s Economic Reform Breakout
1388153594
1386254311
Currency wars are best fought quietly
1359146044
1348554894
1346674021
How Barclays Bank Lost Its Head
1341874532
1337644230
1321907993
Europe’s Disaster Is Headed Our Way
1321379413
1320262447
Yes, Wall Street Helps the Poor
1319515422
1319472927
1319302739
1319216676
1319130430
What If 9/11 Had Never Happened?
1319044140
1318957895
1291248036
Today’s Keynesians have Learnt Nothing
1286582446
1286582442
To do ‘God’s work’, Bankers need Morals
1286582437
ALP’s knight is a Thief in Rusty Armour
1283558436
1276560010
How to take Moral Hazard out of Banking
1260835254
1260835238
1258329614
1257724857
‘Chimerica’ is Headed for Divorce
1251676836
1244937642
Corrupt, Amoral Politicians. An Economy Sinking in Terrifying Debt. And a People Enraged. Britain Ha
1244937615
An Interview with Niall Ferguson
1244937600
1235865651
1231977651
An imaginary retrospective of 2009
1231977645
1231977606
1222732850
1215993640
1206662444
Democracy’s Midwinter - Slow but sure
1201305600
1201219248
An Ottoman warning for America
1199145656
1194566414
1185667235
1183939226
Warfare on the Installment Plan
1181001651
1179014435
1174435256
1110671999
Prepare for the clash of the generations
1064880054
1058745615